1 Comment

Echoing the fate of Narcissus, who tragically failed to recognize his own reflection as merely an image, China, both through internal governance and external perceptions, demonstrates a similar captivating self-reflection that often appears mistaken for global aspiration. René Girard's mimetic theory illustrates the precarious position of self-enchantment akin to that of Narcissus from Greek mythology, highlighting the potential dangers China faces if it continues to cultivate an idealized self-image while neglecting external realities and perspectives.

The inward gaze, driven by a desire not to emulate the West but to reimagine an already idealized self, risks eroding authentic cultural and traditional values under the guise of nationalistic pride and self-sufficiency. This self-enchantment alienates the Chinese citizenry from global discourse, restricting and limiting the freedom and scope of individual thought and not to say expression within the nation. While the younger generations, more connected to the global community through digital platforms, represent a potential force in challenging this inward gaze, the extent of their influence is subject to the significant barriers they face, such as stringent censorship and societal pressure. Despite these challenges, instances of youth-driven dissent and activism have emerged. For example, the 'MeToo' movement saw Chinese students stand in solidarity with survivors of sexual assault, defying state censorship to create a wave of awareness and accountability. Such instances demonstrate the potential of the younger generation to challenge the status quo. However, whether such instances will culminate in substantial societal change remains a matter of speculation.

The erosion of authentic cultural and traditional values has far-reaching consequences on Chinese society beyond China's shores, manifesting in various aspects of daily life. In the media (onshore and offshore), this is evident in the promotion of state-sanctioned narratives and censorship of dissenting voices, leading to a homogenization of public discourse. Similarly, the arts are not immune, with the state exerting control over creative expressions to align with the sanctioned national identity. This stifling of diversity not only limits freedom of thought and expression but also fosters an insular worldview, hindering cultural innovation and vibrancy.

In the Western view, China’s approach towards its cultural identity and nationhood might seem aligned with global standards, but beneath the surface lies a profound internal struggle—a desire not merely to reflect global superpowers but to transcend them by projecting an enhanced self-image. This unconscious mimetic desire of the other self complicates the narrative, as it intertwines admiration with competition, leading to a complex relationship with the West. The intricate dance of adopting advanced technologies and Chinese capitalism which is characterized by an opportunist State, a market economy built on particularistic relationships, and a culturally self-sustained society with strong pragmatist tradition, while simultaneously purging Western influence from its cultural expressions, illustrates this complexity. The CCP’s strategies of promoting traditional Chinese values, juxtaposed with the adoption of Western technological advances, reveal a dual desire: to lead globally while fortifying a unique identity, which might inadvertently erode the authenticity of its cultural legacy.

Understanding this dynamic is crucial not only for comprehending China's current trajectory but also for anticipating its future interactions on the world stage.

Expand full comment