I admire how thoughtful you have been about this issue and your reluctance to be used in an improper way. Your rejection of the "Who" framing was wise.
Not to be a dick, Luke - I love your writing and your approach to these things, I'm a fan - so trust this comes from a good place - but don't you think you did a disservice to all of us by NOT going? You could have at least attempted to get answers to the kinds of questions that were important to ask - by going, and being annoying, you could have gotten to something.. and then if it was important enough, break the NDA and tell us all.
It’s so important to be clear headed and careful about how we frame and respond to everything related to AI. The best reason I have for treating AI as though it’s conscious is just the idea that it’s good practice for treating others well. But we need to be careful not to confuse a ritual or a practice for an actual reality.
I admire how thoughtful you have been about this issue and your reluctance to be used in an improper way. Your rejection of the "Who" framing was wise.
Not to be a dick, Luke - I love your writing and your approach to these things, I'm a fan - so trust this comes from a good place - but don't you think you did a disservice to all of us by NOT going? You could have at least attempted to get answers to the kinds of questions that were important to ask - by going, and being annoying, you could have gotten to something.. and then if it was important enough, break the NDA and tell us all.
It’s so important to be clear headed and careful about how we frame and respond to everything related to AI. The best reason I have for treating AI as though it’s conscious is just the idea that it’s good practice for treating others well. But we need to be careful not to confuse a ritual or a practice for an actual reality.
Thanx Amigo